A war at my high school is raging about Windows being better than a Mac
Hello, I’m here to report something that has been going around my lunch table.
Apparently, a few Winblows lovers are arguing that WinBLOWS is better than the Mac OS. I strongly disagree with them however. But, this one kid who’s my friend has a bunch of reasons why a Windows is better. All these reasons seem very controversial to what I’ve heard:
- “Windows Vista has better security…I once hacked my parents’ Mac. It was so easy to hack their Mac.”
- There are no admin privileges on Macs
- There’s better software for Windows
Only my other friend, who has a MacBook, and I know the REAL truth: Macs are better than winblows.
11-13-08 UPDATE: From my user talk page on Wikipedia-
At a recent forum, Ubuntu, Mac, and Vista were all put to the test of some of the worlds more skilled hackers to find a way into a up-to-date system. The mac box lasted a little over 10 minutes. The windows box hadn’t been cracked by the time the exercise was over.
Macs are pretty, like flowers. Windows is functional, like a set of cutters. Treat the cutters poorly, and they’ll rust and go blunt. Treat them well, and they’ll cut the head off your flowers any day. Doesn’t matter how you treat the flowers though, they’re gonna die eventually
That was quite surprising. Please see my user talk…
Here are some funny error messages I made up.
“Internet Explorer is a piece of crap, and has decided to close on you.”
“00x000x00 – Unreferenced decision to close.”
“Kernel Panic – Woah! You ugly freak!”
I hate Silverlight. Why?
- It’s not open source.
- It’s by Microsoft.
- It’s not simple.
So that’s why I made the campaign against it.
(Silverlight: Ruin the Web button will go here.)
I only have it so I can use sites that require it.
Here’s to an open-source clone!
On Microsoft’s press release site:
“We continue to believe that our proposed acquisition made sense for Microsoft, Yahoo! and the market as a whole. Our goal in pursuing a combination with Yahoo! was to provide greater choice and innovation in the marketplace and create real value for our respective stockholders and employees,” said Steve Ballmer, chief executive officer of Microsoft.
“Despite our best efforts, including raising our bid by roughly $5 billion, Yahoo! has not moved toward accepting our offer. After careful consideration, we believe the economics demanded by Yahoo! do not make sense for us, and it is in the best interests of Microsoft stockholders, employees and other stakeholders to withdraw our proposal,” said Ballmer.
“We have a talented team in place and a compelling plan to grow our business through innovative new services and strategic transactions with other business partners. While Yahoo! would have accelerated our strategy, I am confident that we can continue to move forward toward our goals,” Ballmer said.
“We are investing heavily in new tools and Web experiences, we have dramatically improved our search performance and advertiser satisfaction, and we will continue to build our scale through organic growth and partnerships,” said Kevin Johnson, Microsoft president for platforms and services.
See here for more detail.